Web Site Promotion: Marketing Web

ModRewrite for Apache and IIS

2006-09-19T19:26:00.000-05:00

There's a lot of ModRewrite tutorials out there, but I always had a hard time finding a pretty clear cut explanation for the most common uses: redirecting and making search engine friendly URLs out of query string dynamic ones. Finding a simple laid out example was always a bear as well. A friend recently asked me for a rundown on using ModRewrite for both Apache and IIS servers and I wrote out a pretty good email explanation and thought, hey, perfect blog post. So here goes:

"Rewrite" is a misleading term, nothing it really getting rewritten so to speak. What is happening is you are putting a matching statement first and then what content to serve. This statement sorta says, "If someone asks for this URL, then show them the content that would get served with this address". When you throw a 301 modifier at the end you say, "If someone asks for this URL, give them this content by redirecting them to it."

For Apache you would put something like the following in your .htaccess file. You can proceed a line with # to make it a comment or note that doesn't get processed:

# Something for Apache that is required for ModRewrite module to work
Options +FollowSymLinks

# Duh
RewriteEngine on

# Everything that follows is in relation to the root
RewriteBase /

# Redirecting via a 301 to a new page, ^ starts the match phrase to look for, $ ends it
RewriteRule ^RequestedPage\.html$ /GetBouncedHere.html [NC,R=301,L]

# This is the traditional ModRewrite for search engine friendly URLs
RewriteRule ^([a-zA-Z0-9]+)/pictures/([0-9]+)\.html$ /yourcode.php?type=pictures&forwho=$1&recID=$2 [NC,L]

NC means "no case" specific matching, R=301 is the type of redirect to use, L means this is the last rule, after running this stop and server the page. Inside parenthesis go your variables, things that can change. You have to declare what type of characters these can be, in this case, alpha numerical of either case. The + at the end means an infinite number of character would be allowed, without it it means one character of those types. For each set in parenthesis you plug a $1, $2, $3, etc... into where that variable needs to go into your dynamic URL. They don't have to be in order, you could call $2 before $1. The above would allow you to do something like /joemama/pictures/28.html and serve up a dynamic page that pulls in the record ID 28 from the pictures database for joemama, etc... Because we left out the R=301 we get a "Rewritten" URL instead of being permanently redirected.

For IIS it's the same concept just slightly different syntax and it goes in the httpd.ini file:

[ISAPI_Rewrite]

RewriteRule /OldPage\.html /NewPage\.html [I,RP,L]

RewriteRule /doc(.*)\.html /yourcode.asp\?document=$1 [I,L]

Just about the same except your have to escape (use \ ) on both ends, don't need the ^ and $ to mark the beginning and end of phrase matches. The modifiers at the end differ slightly, L is the same, I means Ignore case, and RP is redirect permanent. Everything else is nearly identical.

Note: Technically in Apache you can use [a-zA-Z0-9] and (.*) interchangeable, but by limiting the type of characters people can try and stick in the URL which gets passed into your query for your database, you prevent errors and security breaches. That's why Apache has that method available and is preferred, at least I think so.

The best tutorials and info on these I have found are:

MSN AdCenter Surveys

2006-09-05T10:08:00.000-05:00

Has anyone else done the online survey MSN AdCenter sent out a few weeks ago? The 6 minute promised survey took more like 30 and the promise of an Amazon gift certificate never materialized. I figured par for the course with those guys, but then they have to gall to send out a notice that they have hired Ipsos Loyalty to conduct a phone survey and I should be expected a call from them over the coming weeks. Problem is I got about 20 of these, one for each client that I'm testing MSN for. Should I expect 20 survey calls whether I want them or not now? Maybe I'll just read them my last post about how much they are doing wrong and then ask them where my certificate is, 20 times.

Premium Turnkey Integrated Modular System Solutions

2006-08-24T13:09:00.000-05:00

Sometimes when people think about their products internally and how they are described, there is a disconnect from what their customers might call them. An example would be a company who says they sell "spacial access systems" when in fact their customers just know them as "doors". Okay, that's an extreme example, but the point is, what you as a business may call your product and what those seeking it call them often can differ greatly. Unless your target audience are versed in these terminologies, companies need to take a hard look at those habits, identify the vague industry insider nomenclatures and abandon them forever. This gets your habits moving in the right direction, calling your products what people might be searching for in everything you do online, links, copy, menus, etc... and your keyword relevancy and search rankings will thank you.

There are also some really really bad habits companies have of naming products and services that are not industry specific, that are so universal that they truly mean nothing. Some good examples are the phrases "turnkey solution" or "modular systems". These mean nothing, not a single thing. Sure, they identify a vague concept, a general way of thinking or approach, but are you selling vague notions? The answer 99.9% of the time is going to have to be absolutely not. So using these phrases in describing your products, how do you ever expect to be found among not only your competitors in your industry, but among every player in every other industry in every market on the planet? That's pretty ambitious and not exactly worth the effort it would have to take. Seriously, this is like trying to rank for "widgets". Why do it? Abandon these all encompassing terms, don't be lazy in naming what you do, get specific, use the research you have, ask your customers to describe your products. This is one of those many cases where board members don't know best. If you ever find yourself describing your offerings in one of those meaningless vague phrases, stop immediately. Those bad habits will spill over into your online marketing and you will fail to connect to your customers.

"But this is what my customers call them," you might say, and that may be true enough. But if they hit the search engines and try their vague phrase and get the random unrelated junk that is inevitably going to be spit back out at them, you can bet your last dollar that they are going to qualify that search term and get a better result. THAT is where you want to be found. So, by putting your SEO efforts on terms like this, you not only give yourself a better chance for success, you also end up with a better more qualified pool of traffic. That means better conversion rates, and THAT is what you are doing this all for. Remember, it's not broad rankings and traffic that counts, but conversions!

MSN AdCenter = Sloppy, Sloppy Work

2006-08-24T10:34:00.000-05:00

Yeah, it's been a while since I posted, I've got a few other blogs going on, but a pure need to talk about how MSN AdCenter is so mishandled has prompted me to speak up. Here are some major issues I've found that are just sloppy and totally unacceptable from supposedly the world's largest computer software company:

The support emails I get, they come from Moonshot Dev (BY2MTZPSQLE07) . WHAT??? Moonshot Dev... and a bunch of meaningless characters, very nice. But I will give them this, it's a step up from what they used to come from some long raw mail server address that looked like they didn't bother to take the minute needed to set up an email alias.

But the best part? Everytime I go to open their support email I get a big fat "Website Certified by an Unknown Authority" warning. Upon inspection it's because they decided to serve the graphic header for the email from: https://adcenter.msn.com/images/adCenter_p_h_pos_309x56.gif and then not bother to be sure the secure certificate at that location is set up right. So a big message proclaims that the trustworthiness of adcenter.msn.com is in question. Well, maybe they are just being honest. It's still unclear why a graphic needs to be served from a secure server anyhow, but Microsoft can't be bothered with petty little things like doing anything correct, now can they?

So why did I need a support email? Well apparently one of my ads ran afoul of their guidelines. They do not allow pharmaceutical sites to run ads on their network, and their sophisticated automated review system caught this disgusting violation. Uh, except that the ad was for a Pharmicist Job Search site, not drugs. The ad language, the resulting page and the keywords that were being bid on all clearly indicate the intent. But, you know, I can see the mistake... one time. But after getting on the phone a couple months ago to clear up the confusion and get the ads reinstated, 2 months later the exact same problem has occured on the exact same ads that have not changed. Way to bandaid the problem and not solve the underlying issue!

And let's talk about conversion tracking. It's the most useful thing a PPC can ever provide, it let's you know your ROI. But rather than provide a comprehensive tracking script that works in every browser because it's just standard plain old javascript like EVERY other PPC service out there, they provide some oddity that works just fine, unless you have Firefox. So what, you say. It's a minor player in the market place and so you don't track a portion of your conversions. Well, depending on your audience Firefox can be an average of 20% of your users, even higher for tech geared sites. If you're pushing any type of volume of traffic, that's a lot of people. But no, it doesn't just mean you lose some tracking data, your users actaully get some kind of secure certificate error on their confirmation page if you are using secure transactions. So your user completes their credit card transaction and gets an error message, that's just wonderful. That won't generate concerned calls from panicked customers or destroy your site's appearance of trust with secure information for consumers. It begs the question: Did Microsoft put this gotcha in for their most feared competitor in the browser market place intentionally, which would be unethical and flat out wrong for their advertisers, or are they just grossly incompetent in their development? There are only two answers to why that is happening, and neither is a good thing.

The reportingis horrible and gives you nothing useful as a report and you will never ever ever get the information you requested then. No, you get a "your report is being created, please return to request it again later and you can view it then" type message. Sadly this is what you see in Yahoo Search Marketing on occassion as well, and that needs to stop. Both you guys, buy a few more servers to handle the processing, stop being cheap, it's not acceptable to make me wait 5 minutes to tell me my click through rate for last month.

I won't even go into the oddly named sections of the interface, such as "orders" for something that well, isn't what anyone in their right mind would think of as an order.

So... maybe the big lesson to learn here is this: Beta testing in France is a stupid idea.

Google Analytics Invite... Finally

2006-02-24T10:16:00.000-05:00

Been a little behind in posting, have had some family matters to tend to not to mention my upcoming wedding! But, I'm happy to say I finally received a Google Analytics invite for a client and will be posting some thoughts and observations on that very soon. I have to say so far, having to retract new signups and then wait months and months for any sign of providing the service is already giving Google a big F minus in my book. Don't launch if you can't produce, that's amateur hour stuff and surely should not be coming from an industry leader.

Yahoo! Updates Again Tonight

2005-11-14T09:02:00.000-05:00

Quick on the heels of their last update, Yahoo! Search Blog reports another update to their index will be happening tonight.

Yahoo! Update Tonight

2005-11-02T11:06:00.000-05:00

Tim Mayer of Yahoo! posts that the index for their search engine will be updating tonight. Be sure to check your rankings in the morning to celebrate your progress and bemoan your failures.

Yahoo! Site Explorer

2005-10-24T15:02:00.000-05:00

I'm a little late on this one, but the Yahoo! Site Explorer is a great tool for analyzing the depth of your crawl in Yahoo!'s search index. If anything, it's good to see search engines taking an active role in helping marketers do their thing. Instead of just assuming spam and junk listings are the only goal of site promoters, this kind of stuff sends a positive signal that the role of search engine promotion is being recognized and the relationship between search engine and marketers is taking a much less adversarial tone.

Google Expands Its Offerings

2005-08-29T16:21:00.000-05:00

3 announcements last week by Google showed the ever increasing reach and scope of the search giant and may be providing insight into the future direction of the company and its services.

On August 22nd Google announced Google Desktop 2, which was more than an update to the system wide searching utility. The biggest noticable change was the addition of the sidebar utility which could be likened to the Dashboard feature in Apple's latest OS release. This sidebar allows you to use Google created and third party plugins to display a variety of things like weather, stock info, photo slide shows and RSS feeds. There's a lot of automated and customizable features to explore. I was able to use an RSS feed from Yahoo's Flickr photo sharing service to have the sidebar display dynamically updated photos on a particular topic. Right now I have photos of storm damage from Hurricane Katrina showing up on my sidebar using a customized FeedBurner feed showing Flickr tag word: "Hurricane". Seems pretty extensible, so developers should have fun with it and users will reap the benefits.

On August 24 the Google Blog reported that Google Talk was realeased into the wild, which will rival IM services like AOL's Instant Messenger and similar offerings by MSN and others. The system uses the open XMPP protocol which means it can be used by other apps such as Apple's iChat, Trillian, Adium and others. It also allows voice calls on the network so users on the system can communicate verbally. One has to ponder whether Google has an eye in the direction of voice over IP solutions. A Gmail account login is needed to be on the system.

Also the same day, Google announced that Gmail is open to the public. No longer do potential Gmail users need to be a friend of a friend of a friend who begged on a message board to be invited. Anyone can now go to gmail.com and signup for their free email account, and presumably ditch AOL in exchange for their ability to use Google Talk.

Three big moves, and with Google snatching up dark fiber, the overall goal of the company to possibly become a wider player in the online communication arena may have just come into a little better focus.

It's Okay to Bid On GEICO

2005-08-18T08:47:00.000-05:00

The Google Blog has a post explaining the recent GEICO v. Google court ruling and what it's implications are. Short answer: You can bid on trademarked words as a keyword, but not include them in your ad text.

Google to Release Firefox Toolbar

2005-07-07T09:15:00.000-05:00

Slashdot reports that Google is soon to be releasing their toolbar for the Firefox browser. There are several extensions already available for Firefox, however, that provide most of the features of the toolbar (and in some cases better implemented.)

MSN Screensaver with Search & RSS

2005-07-27T08:39:00.000-05:00

The MSN Search Weblog has a post announcing a free MSN Screensaver with Search & RSS. Every now and then something comes along that makes you have to say, huh? I guess I'm having trouble understanding the concept behind putting stuff you have to read on your screen saver. Are they envisioning people sitting around staring at their inactive screens, trying not to touch the mouse to disrupt the display of RSS feeds and web pages? Why not just go to the web pages or to one of a million start pages provided by Yahoo, Google and everyone else that provides all these features on demand. Am I not getting it... or is Microsoft?

Yahoo! Launching New Search Index Tonight

2005-06-20T09:01:00.000-05:00

Yahoo! Search blog for the second time is announcing when its index will be updated, which is later tonight. I guess they can expect high volumes of SEO professionals scouring their SERPs in the morning. From the announcement: "We will be making changes to the index tonight so you should be seeing more of your pages in the index as well as some fluctuations in the rankings of results from previous searches."

Tabbed Browsing Available in MSN Toolbar

2005-06-09T11:56:00.000-05:00

MSN Search's WebLog reports that tabbed browsing is now a feature of MSN Search Toolbar with Windows Desktop Search (still waaaay too long a name). Despite the Johnny come lately headline of "Tabbed browsing is here!", this post is good news for those who still use only Internet Explorer for their browsing, adding a great feature every other browser user has been enjoying. Tabbed browsing is expected to be a built in feature of the upcoming IE7, but this toolbar update will allow IE 5.01 users and up to access the feature now. Special settings for using the tabs to enhance your search experience are included as well.

Faster Searching with Firefox

2005-03-31T09:26:00.000-05:00

Never one to pass up a chance to tweak the finer details, Google announces faster search result loading with Firefox and Mozilla browsers. Apparently the search engine results page instructs these browsers to preload the first page of results so the deemed most relevant page that rises to the top of the SERPs will already be in your cache. Works good, and definitely makes a difference.

Personalized Google Homepage

2005-05-20T08:06:00.000-05:00

Google has released a personalized homepage service that rivals My Yahoo and other custom start page services. The old plain vanilla homepage is still the default face of Google. I'm sure there will be two camps on this one; Those who want the simple time-tested Google interface, and those who yearn for an easier way to access all of Google's cool features, and I hope both options remain.

Google Sitemaps

2005-06-03T11:51:00.000-05:00

Google Sitemaps is a new free service that allows webmasters and marketers to submit XML feeds of the URLs they would like Google to index and how often the content is refreshed and in need of a new crawl. This will go a long way towards getting more of your sites into the Google index and keeping them updated. Some basic reporting will be provided such as when you last submitted a Sitemap and when Google last fetched it. Search Engine Watch has a great interview with Shiva Shivakumar, Google's technical lead on the project.

Final Release of MSN Search Toolbar

2005-05-19T08:36:00.000-05:00

msnsearch's WebLog reports that their toolbar search project has reached final release and is available for download. Apparently, the new name for this product is "MSN Toolbar Suite with Desktop Search". Quite a mouthful!

Why Google Scares Bill Gates

2005-05-05T09:20:00.000-05:00

Just read a fascinating Fortune article about the history and current events of the growing battle between Google and Microsoft. A lot of great background and quotes from the key players, a must read!

Google Maps Now Adds Satellite Imagery

2005-04-06T15:50:00.000-05:00

I'm a little slow on this one as I've been busy playing with the awesome new addition to Google Maps, satellite views. This is a feature that disappeared from MapQuest some time ago, and now Google has implemented it thanks to the previous addition of Keyhole Corp. to their portfolio. It's incredible fast and seamless and sets the bar for online maps and direction services. With the recent traffic data systems addition Google is working on, Google Maps is soon to pull ahead as the undisputed online map source.

Google Acquires Traffic Info Start-Up

2005-03-31T14:51:00.000-05:00

According to an article on SiliconBeat, Google's recent 2004 annual report shows a new subsidiary ZIPDash. This company provides real time traffic information, and it looks like Google Maps is following Yahoo Maps into the traffic reporting arena.

Google Adds Support for Stock Quotes

2005-03-31T09:21:00.000-05:00

From the "features you thought Google already had" file, the Google Blog is reporting that Google now adds support for stock quotes. Previously it would link you to sites that had the information you're looking for, now Google provides in line graphs and recent trends when you simply search for a stock ticker symbol. You'll also find the familiar links to Yahoo Finance as well.

Google Maps

2005-02-08T09:48:00.000-05:00

It's still in rough BETA, but Google Maps is out there for the public's eyes. The live scrolling and zooming is excellent, however every address I put in was inaccurate to a degree in regards to where the pinpoint aimed. The directions it gave me also were never the shortest route and sometimes gave odd detours that made no sense. It's BETA, so that's to be expected, but I can't wait until the technology acquired from their recent purchase of Keyhole Corp., a 3D mapping service, gets integrated.

A9 and Photo Yellow Pages

2005-01-27T13:31:00.000-05:00

Amazon's A9 search engine project, which has been relatively unnoticed lately amongst all the changes in the big 3 engines, is now offering a yellow pages service. The difference in this service is that Amazon has sent out camera equipped vans to begin photo mapping store fronts and blocks to make a searchable and viewable yellow pages directory. Sounds like an ambition undertaking that initially is applying to only a few markets. CNET has a great article providing an overview of the new service.

Search Engine Usage Report Released

2005-01-24T13:42:00.000-05:00

A recent study on search engine usage is reporting several interesting results on how people use search engines and their understanding level of them. A suprising number of people of an older demographic are still unable to distinguish the paid from the free search listings, and many list the inability to do so as a reason they do not trust results. Also of interest was a statistic that showed the greater majority of searchers regularly use 2 or 3 different engines as opposed to sticking with just 1. The most obvious stat in the report was that most of what people search for is pretty much useless trivia, which any glance at the Google Zeitgeist for the year will tell you.